Search This Blog

Monday 21 April 2014

New main force RAF Bomber Command Film?

'The Dam Busters' is undoubtedly a great film, except perhaps for the water plume special effects. I saw in the newspaper a couple of weeks ago that the proposed re-make of the film is no nearer completion – which is perhaps no bad thing.

I have the utmost respect for all those involved in Operation Chastise, and the 1955 movie, however, 55,573 Bomber Command aircrew lost their lives during the Second World War – surely it is time for a film depicting 'main force' RAF Bomber Command operations. A British answer to the movie 'Memphis Belle' is long overdue (I am aware that David Puttnam originally intended the tale to be a Royal Air Force story).

Forgive the pun, but a new Bomber Command film need not set out to be a blockbuster – what more potential for drama, tension or emotion could there be than in the exploits of the likes of Norman Lyford, Frank Law, Cy Barton, Frank Wadge and countless others - devotion to duty and acts of selfless courage were nightly occurrences.

Why hasn't this film been made? Something to do with the elephant in the room – the ethics of the aerial bombing of cities perhaps?

Those of you with a copy of 'Does Life Hold Any More in Store' will know my view of the proposition that bombing was not only wrong, but could be deemed a war crime. This may be the philosophical view, but in the context of the progression of the Second World War - in my humble opinion and as Jim Ives would probably have said - drivel! 

Having been on the receiving end of the 'Blitz', having trained-up air-crews, manufactured aircraft and ordnance and with no other practicable way of attacking Germany and its war industries the RAF's aerial bombing of cities was – a 'no brainer'.

The Second World War became 'Total War', where civilians became engaged in the 'war effort'. I do not accept that the aim of bombing was to kill people. I believe that the intention was to destroy industries, to de-house workers, to divert resources away from battle-fronts, to disrupt the lives of the German working population – to damage the enemy in any way possible.

Lord Cherwell asserted early in 1942 - 'Investigation seems to show that having ones house demolished is most damaging to morale. People seem to mind it more than having their friends or even relatives killed.

There were certain to be civilian deaths - collateral casualties, as were suffered in Britain.

Germany had a comprehensive radar-based air-raid warning network, night-fighters, searchlights, flak batteries, air-raid shelters and the same opportunity as Britain had exercised to evacuate vulnerable civilians.

Surely, seventy years after the events it is possible to accept that the aerial bombing of cities and towns was an aspect of 'total war' – it was perpetrated by both sides.

So – how about this new film then? No doubt that it could be stimulating on visual, cerebral and emotional levels - not to celebrate the bombing of cities – but to acknowledge that aerial bombing was a feature of the Second World War, and to examine the courage of our bomber crews (and Germany's night-fighter pilots for that matter).

An honest depiction of bombing operations would lead to a better understanding of what RAF Bomber Command crews were tasked to do, as 'Das Boot' did for German submariners –  portray wartime servicemen fighting the enemy, the enemy's defences, the elements, luck and fate.






No need for apologies nor penitence – just acknowledge and accept that it happened and it should not happen again. 






11 comments:

  1. Hi John,
    I also agree with you that 70 years after the event, although the amount of lives lost was shocking, it has to now be viewed as an unfortunate part of total warfare which was experienced by both sides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks for that Hayley - a major part of the War has been/ is being ignored. I'm sure the new film would be of interest in much of Europe (including Germany), Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and all other countries with RAF BC connections. The USA? - would probably be of no or only limited interest!!!

      Delete
  2. Dam Busters# well what about the 55 thousand + that also gave their all ?
    Factual film is needed not scripted junk prime example saving private Ryan that is my view.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dresden that's why no film will be made fact!

      Delete
    2. Exactly - needs to be made soon as all our technical advisors are now in their nineties - it would be nice if the film did them justice, and that some of them could see it.

      Delete
    3. Dominik,

      My point entirely - Dresden is the bulk of the elephant in the room. It is hardly representative of the role played by Bomber Command for most of the war.

      The Dresden raids have been coloured by a great deal of propaganda, distortion and myth.

      The bombing was a combined RAF / USAAF effort on predominantly a transportation target over a couple of nights/day with little opposition. The operations apparently had the added political components of assisting the Russian advance and showing Stalin the power of Allied bombing. Goebbels' propaganda grossly inflated the casualty figures by (it is thought) x10. The fact that the city was likened architecturally to Florence is, to my mind, irrelevant. The war was still ongoing - I have played a lot of sport over the years and one thing I've learned is that you don't let-up until the game is over.

      For me Dresden would not be the most likely subject and (although I have only seen it once) the tv film 'Dresden' is complete hokum – you wouldn't want a new film to be confused with that.

      Nor is the bombing of Dresden a reason not to make a film, but perhaps that's a different film which needs a purely documentary treatment.

      To my mind the obvious subject for the film would be 'The Battle of Berlin' – a campaign asserted by some commentators to have been a 'defeat' for Bomber Command – (I disagree), but yet another reason for examination by movie.

      Delete
    4. sadly I don't know what a noob is!

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous commenter
    Don't enter a adult conversation and post stupid comments, you clearly have not grown up yet.. The door is this way >> please close it when you leave and when you grow up you might respect all the service personnel who gave their all to let silly minded people like you have what you do today ..

    ReplyDelete